tarrloksdiaper:

biblicalentropy:

reblooged:

philosophy-daily:

just a reminder

Reblooged~!

I’m guessing I’ll lose at least 5 followers over this, because people don’t like things that contradict their reality.

Dedicated to people who say that I should have no moral objection to murdering people because I’m not religious.

tarrloksdiaper:

biblicalentropy:

reblooged:

philosophy-daily:

just a reminder

Reblooged~!

I’m guessing I’ll lose at least 5 followers over this, because people don’t like things that contradict their reality.

Dedicated to people who say that I should have no moral objection to murdering people because I’m not religious.

(via atheismfuckyeah)

thisisnotafrica:

mehreenkasana:

Photographers who didn’t step in to help

What’s it like to witness a mob attack, a starving child or the aftermath of a bomb, and take a photograph instead of stopping to help? As two journalists are under fire for recording rather than intervening in a sex attack in India, Guardian asks people who know.

A very tough debate between ethical responsibility and photography. What would you do?

Bolded. Hmm I feel If you’re taking picstues of falling buildings or natural disasters that are way beyond your control, It’s a pass. but taking photos of people practically right next to you so you can use in your college/art project or profit off for whatever reason is despicable.